Tales from the Deuce: My 2012 Michigan Preview

Head Coach: Brady Hoke; 58-52 (11-2 at Michigan)

2011 Record: 11-2 (6-2 conference)

Returning Starters: 15 (6 offense, 7 defense, P, K)

Overview: What a difference a year makes. Just think about it. This time last year, many Michigan fans wondered whether then-newly installed head football coach Brady Hoke would be up to the task of returning the Wolverines to prominence. On the one hand, Hoke had built a reputation as a program builder with stops at Ball State and San Diego State, respectively. However, this was Michigan; a bigger stage with brighter lights. Could Hoke really do it? Or was he destined to suffer the same fate as his predecessor, Rich Rodriguez? Thankfully things turned out well for the Wolverines in 2011. And it started the day Hoke was named head coach.  After all, he looked like the head football coach at Michigan; heck he even talked like the head football coach at Michigan, saying all the right things. The next 11 months or so proved to be no different.

For starters, Hoke made arguably, the best coaching hire in all of college football last year by luring Greg Mattison away from the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League. He then proceeded to assemble the 7th ranked recruiting class (according to Rivals.com) in the nation. Then, to top things off, he led Michigan to an 11-win season, culminating with Michigan’s first BCS bowl win in over a decade. So what then, does Hoke have in store for an encore? Good question. The schedule is brutal and they lose key players on the defensive front. Still, the offense should be better, so let’s start there.

Offense: Michigan’s offense will once again be led by senior quarterback Denard Robinson. Although Robinson isn’t the most polished passer to ever wear the maize & blue, he is certainly one of the most electrifying. Indeed, Robinson’s accomplishments have been the stuff of legend. As the Wolverines’ starting quarterback, Robinson has shattered nearly every team, conference or NCAA rushing record for quarterbacks. In addition, observers and coaches alike have remarked that Robinson has continued to improve his skills as a passer, which should improve the efficiency of the offense. He will have help from an experienced offensive line led by junior left tackle Taylor Lewan. Also, expect Michael Schofield to make an impact up front as he moves to a more natural position at the other tackle spot. Tailback Fitzgerald Toussaint returns as Michigan’s leading rusher from 2011, but he may have to sit out a game due to disciplinary reasons. In his stead will be sophomore Thomas Rawls, who- if you believe everything running back coach Fred Jackson says- is the second coming of Tshimanga Biakabutuka.

Where Michigan will struggle is at receiver. Junior Jeremy Gallon, and senior Roy Roundtree return as starters, but neither have the big-play capability that the departed Junior Hemingway brought to the offense. One possible solution to this problem may be the much-ballyhooed conversion of quarterback Devin Gardner to wide receiver. While the internets have been abuzz with Gardner’s progress, it is still an open question as to whether Gardner can provide the deep threat the offense will need in order to punch their ticket to Indianapolis for the Big Ten Title game. Grade: B+

Defense: The coaching change in Ann Arbor had no greater impact on the team than on defense. It is hardly news that Michigan’s defenses under the previous regime were historically dreadful. Thankfully Greg Mattison’s return to Ann Arbor resulted in the Wolverines jumping from 101st to 8th nationally in scoring defense. This year, sophomore linebackers Jake Ryan and Desmond Morgan return, as does sophomore cornerback Blake Countess. Rounding out the back seven are seniors Kenny Demens (ILB) Jordan Kovacs (S), who were 1st and 2nd, respectively, on the team in tackling.

Quite honestly, the only thing stopping the Wolverines from having one of the best defenses in the country is the lack of depth on the defensive line. Without question, the absence of tackles Mike Martin and Ryan Van Bergen will prove to be problematic all season long. Left to fill the void will be senior defensive linemen Will Campbell and Quinton Washington. Combined, these two players have started one game, and they will be replacing two guys that started over 50; not what I would call a recipe for success. Grade: B

Special Teams: This area just might prove to be a strength for the Wolverines. Gone are the days of going for it on 4th & 5 inside the opponent’s 20-yard line due to a well-placed fear that our kicker couldn’t make a 30+yard field goal. Brendan Gibbons made sure of that when he hit a 37-yard field goal to win the Sugar Bowl last January. While Gibbons won’t ever be confused with Ali Haji-Sheikh, he has proved to be reliable. The punting situation is a bit murkier with Hoke recently announcing an open competition between junior Will Hagerup and sophomore Matt Wile. However, Hoke has recently stated that Hagerup will handle punting, so that is a positive. Receiver Gallon will handle punt returns, while sophomore Josh Furman (S) is listed as the kick returner. Expect speedy true freshman Dennis Norfleet to push them both. Grade: B

Final Analysis: It is quite possible that the Wolverines will have a better overall team this year and still have a worse record. For the first time since the Carr era, the Wolverines will field a team with talent, senior leadership at key positions, and continuity in the coaching staff. Unfortunately the schedule is brutal. Last year, the Wolverines’ first five games were at home. This year the Wolverines will begin the season in Dallas against the reigning national champion, Alabama Crimson Tide. And it doesn’t get any easier with road games against Notre Dame, Nebraska and Ohio State. Nevertheless, success for the Wolverines will turn on three things:

  1. Whether Denard Robinson can take the next step as a passer.
  2. Whether the back 7 can compensate for the severe lack of depth and experience on the defensive line.
  3. Whether Devin Gardner can provide some game-breaking ability at wideout.

Prediction: 9-3 (6-2 conference; 2nd place in the legends division) with losses against Alabama, Nebraska and Ohio State.

Michigan Spring Game: Hoke Springs Eternal [Part II]

Ah yes. It’s that time of the year. That time when endless speculation concerning the fate our beloved Wolverines reaches its zenith. Indeed, the annual Michigan Football Spring Game was yesterday, and the second for head coach Brady Hoke. The Wolverines are coming off of an impressive season that saw the team win 11 games including a win in the Sugar Bowl. Appropriately, anticipation is high.

While the Wolverines return 15 starters from last year (6 offense, 7 defense, K/P), they need to fill some big holes on the offensive and defensive lines. Nevertheless, the Wolverines are right to expect much out of this year. They still boast one of the nation’s most dangerous offenses with quarterback Denard Robinson under center. There’s also reason for optimism in the running game as Fitzgerald Toussaint returns as the starting tailback, and probably Michigan’s best since the days of Mike Hart. Defensively, the losses of Mike Hart and Ryan Van Bergen will be significant, but the back 7 is almost entirely intact.

As the endless speculation continues, here are some of my observations from yesterday’s game.*

  1. Toussaint looks poised to build upon his success last year. He runs with great anticipation and without hesitancy.
  2. Quarterback Russell Bellomy looked pretty comfortable in the pocket. They didn’t run anything complicated through or at him. But he’s certainly better than the Nick Sheridan or David Cones of the world
  3. I was ready to call Thomas Rawls the latest beneficiary of running back coach Fred Jackson’s hyperbolic tendencies, but then he broke a long one. He’s got great size, runs downhill, and appears to have good vision, which is key for a tailback.
  4. Devin Gardner = meh. Looked great running with the rock, but I really only saw one good throw, and it was probably a better catch by Jeremy Gallon
  5. I liked what I saw out of the O-Line (both 1st and 2nd units).
  6. Having said that, it may just be that our D-lines weren’t all that impressive.
  7. With Junior Hemingway gone and Daryl Stonum off the team, there isn’t a whole lot to be excited about in the passing game. But Jeremy Gallon made a great adjustment in the air to catch a Gardner Pass. He and opposite receiver Roy Roundtree will be leaned on heavily to make plays given how thin the Wolverines are at the position.
  8. It was nice to see cornerback Blake Countess picking up right where he left off from last year. Granted it wasn’t the greatest pass from Gardner, but Countess showed off some skills with the pick.
  9. Thank god I didn’t block out an afternoon to watch this game in person. It was easily the most boring, vanilla spring game I’ve seen in a long time.
  10. But maybe that’s a good thing. Maybe it’s a sign of stability for the Wolverines. After all, this is the first time since the Carr era that we’ve had the same quarterback and offensive/defensive coordinators in back-to-back years.

*I fully comprehend that the Spring Game is merely exhibition. While the game features live contact, the quarterbacks are coddled and neither coordinator shows a whole lot, so caveats abound.

Tales from the Deuce [My Michigan Football Preview]

2011 Michigan Football Preview

Head Coach: Brady Hoke: 47-50 lifetime; (0-0 at Michigan)

2010 Record: 7-6 (3-5 Conference)

Returning Starters: 16 (8 offense, 8 defense)

The Team, the team, the team . . . so said legendary head football coach Bo Schembechler, whose coaching philosophy was rooted in a belief that success on the football field required selflessness, discipline, toughness, and above all else, a dedication to “the team.” Though Schembechler’s rugged and tough team-first approach to coaching endured within the Michigan program, long after Schembechler last patrolled the sidelines, many believe that Michigan lost sight of this identity under most recent head coach Rich Rodriguez. Don’t worry, this isn’t a re-hashing of those brief and tumultuous years under Rodriguez; I’ve already done that. Rather, this is a look forward. Thankfully, the events of the last few months lead me to believe that newly installed head coach Brady Hoke has things looking up in Ann Arbor. Whether the fruits of Hoke’s labor are fully realized in year one is another matter.

Offense: Michigan returns 8 starters from a juggernaut offense that ranked 6th in the nation. With junior quarterback/superhuman freak/Sonic the Hedgehog clone Denard Robinson at the helm, no doubts exist as to the explosiveness of the offense. What lies in doubt is how quickly the offense, or more importantly Robinson, will adapt to the system installed by new offensive coordinator Al Borges. Doubt exists solely because Hoke prefers to run MANBALL, which is a pedestrian way of saying that Hoke wants to run a more physical pro-style offense. Despite Hoke’s preference, all indications are that we’ll see more spread than expected this year. A more gradual transition to MANBALL should help Denard, who is affected the most by this change in offensive philosophy.

While early returns on Denard’s adjustment to the new offense (e.g. the spring game) were less than encouraging, all indications are that he has improved dramatically since that time. Besides, ole’ Shoelace won’t have to do it alone. He’ll be aided by an experienced offensive line led by senior David Molk who is on the Rimington Watch List as the nation’s top collegiate center. There is also a lot of experience at the skill positions. Senior wide receiver Darryl Stonum’s speed will be missed on the outside, but junior Roy Roundtree and senior Junior Hemingway should help pick up the slack. On the ground, no player has emerged as the clear-cut leader. As of today, Mike Shaw and Fitzgerald Toussaint are vying for the top spot, with Shaw leading by a nose. Regardless, the lack of a clear leader at tailback is troubling; thankfully we have Denard. Last, but certainly not least is senior tight end and captain Kevin Koger, who is talented and figures to play a prominent role in Borges’ offense. Grade: B+

Defense: Before the announcement of Greg Mattison as the defensive coordinator, the best thing that I could say about the defense was that it couldn’t get any worse. With Mattison calling the shots on D, I expect marked improvement. For the first time in 3 years, Michigan will have a coherent strategy on defense. Gone is the much-maligned 3-3-5 alignment. In its place is the 4-3 that Michigan ran for years pre-Rodriguez. Once again, the defense will be led by superhuman senior defensive tackle Mike Martin, who should be less encumbered playing in a 4-man front. Other defensive standouts include senior corner Troy Woolfolk, who returns after missing all of last season due to a broken ankle, and middle linebacker Kenny Demens. Question marks abound on defense though. Will Craig Roh break through as the pass rusher Michigan needs? Is this the year Will Campbell makes his mark? Are we playing the right guys at the WILL and SAM linebacker positions? And finally, is JT Floyd the guy at the other corner spot? He’ll be pushed by freshman Blake Countess and sophomore Courtney Avery, but he should stick at that spot.  In any event, these are all tough questions to answer, but critical questions nonetheless. Grade: C

Special Teams: Michigan’s special teams units were a mixed bag last year. On one hand, punter Will Hagerup really came on last year as the punter many expected when he was recruited. On the other hand, kickers Seth Broekhuizen and Brandon Gibbons were so horrendous at times, that it severely limited what options Rodriguez had inside the 20. Fast forward to this year, and the picture is still hazy. Hagerup has since been suspended for the non-conference portion of the schedule for undisclosed reasons, leaving freshman stud Matt Wile (a kicker) as his replacement. Wile will also challenge at kicker where Gibbons appears to be the incumbent.  Questions also persist in the return game. Sophomore Jeremy Gallon again figures to play a prominent role as the return man, but that should give any fan pause, as he constantly struggled last year in the same capacity.  Grade: C-

Final Analysis: Michigan’s success turns on three issues: (1) how well Denard & company adapt to Borges’ tweaked offense; (2) whether guys like Cam Gordon, Craig Roh, Tom Gordon, and JT Floyd/Courtney Avery can take that next step as players; and (3) how healthy Michigan remains all year as that was a major issue last year. The resolution of these three issues will likely dictate how far Hoke can take these guys this year. Especially since the schedule is not very friendly. By my count, 5 games (WMU, EMU, SDSU, Minn., & Purdue) can be safely considered wins. I think 3 (MSU, Neb, Iowa) will be close, but probably losses.  That leaves 4 (Illinois, Northwestern, OSU and Notre Dame) up in the air.

Prediction: 8-4; we beat ND, Illinois, and OSU, only because we’re better than Illinois, and we play ND and OSU at home. OSU will be a tougher game than some think, but the coaches have placed a laser-like focus on the school down south, which will pay off in the end.

Tales from the Deuce

Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss

Michigan State 34 – Michigan 17

As a self-professed “know-it-all” I often relish being right.  But not today.  Yesterday my beloved Wolverines felt the full thrust of Sparty’s pimp hand, and it was not fun.  I predicted that the Spartans would win, but I expected our offense to score more points against our in-state rivals.  Though we moved the ball with ease, costly mistakes led to the margin of victory.  Here are a few thoughts on what I think were keys to yesterday’s game. Continue reading

Tales from the Deuce

Michigan State Week

Preview: As the Wolverines head into tomorrow’s big game against in-state rival Michigan State, thoughts abound.  For starters, the Wolverines are about where I thought they’d be at this point.  At the beginning of the season, I predicted the Wolverines would finish 7-5 for the year.  Currently standing at 5-0, the Wolverines should get to 7 wins by mid November.  Unfortunately, the schedule gets pretty tough as we head into the Big Ten Schedule.  I felt (as did most others) that the offense would carry the team and that the defense would struggle.  What I did not foresee is how dominant Denard Robinson would be as the quarterback.  So for that, I’m pumped to have a game-breaker on offense.  On the other hand, I’m not that surprised at the state of the defense.  I figured they would be pretty bad, and they’ve lived up to expectations.  For that reason, I can’t see the Wolverines pulling off a victory tomorrow in Ann Arbor. Continue reading

Tales from the Deuce

Michigan Recap: Notre Dame

Final Score: Michigan 28 Notre Dame 24

Wow.  I’m sure there are better superlatives I could use to describe Denard Robinson’s performance today, but I can’t think of one right now.  Without question, this guy has exceeded my expectations as a quarterback by leaps and bounds. How?  All Robinson did was eclipse his previous record for total offense by a Michigan quarterback (383) by amassing 502 yards in total offense.  I was off a little in my prediction (3 points) but oh well.  Generally, I feel relieved with the win.  We didn’t move the ball as well as I would have thought, but then Notre Dame is, well still Notre Dame, which means they’ve got tons of talent.  And that showed on several occasions.

For all of Denard’s heroics, we weren’t the most efficient offense (3-16 on third downs), nor were we all that productive with our running backs (only Denard averaged more than 3 ypc).  Combine that with the fact that Notre Dame’s starting quarterback Dayne Crist missed most of the 1st half and there’s much to be concerned about as the Wolverines approach Big Ten play.  Here are my heroes and goats.

Heroes: Aside from Robinson, Roy Roundtree, Daryl Stonum, Jonas Mouton, and Jordan Kovacs (for the most part)

Goats: Patrick Omameh, Kelvin Grady, Cameron Gordon

I give Notre Dame coach Brian Kelly a lot of credit.  He had his team up for the game, his offense looked well adjusted to the new system, and his defense (aside from Robinson’s heroics) played quite well at times; especially Manti Te’o.  Kyle Rudolph is a stud (no surprise) and their offensive line played much better than I expected.  In the end, it came down to the best player on the field, and for the second week in a row, it was Denard Robinson.  Though the Wolverines were the ones with the luck today, I’ll take the win; after all, the Irish had their chances.

Tales from the Deuce

Preview: Notre Dame

Who: Michigan @ Notre Dame
When: Saturday, September 11, 2010; 3:30 ET
Line: Notre Dame -4
Forecast: High of 67º; showers and thunderstorms before 2pm

Two of college football’s most storied programs collide again tomorrow in a game that should say a lot about the strength of each team this season.  With both teams coming off of decisive victories last week, its still too difficult to tell just how good either team is.  And there’s the drama.  For the Irish, revenge should be on their minds after last year’s thrilling defeat in Ann Arbor.  For the Wolverines, a victory would signify progress as head coach Rich Rodriguez continues to develop his system, and move the program towards relevance once again among college football’s elite programs.  What does all of this mean for the Wolverines?  Well, its a mixed bag.  On one hand, history tells us that the Wolverines have struggled in South Bend.  In fact they’ve only won 4 times since 1978.  The weather forecast should give Michigan fans pause as well.  The last time the two teams met in South Bend, the conditions were also wet and Michigan turned the ball over 6 times!  Oh and one more thing, Rich Rod has only won 1 game on the road during his tenure.  Quarterback Nick Sheridan led the Wolverines to a victory against the hapless Minnesota Golden Gophers (thanks Milman).

Still, glaring facts notwithstanding, Michigan has clear advantages over Notre Dame in the personnel department.  Neither team plays great defense.  But both have weapons on the offensive side of the ball.  For Michigan, quarterback Denard Robinson is as dangerous as they get.  For Notre Dame, first year starter Dayne Crist has the talent to make Michigan’s weak secondary pay by connecting to either tight end Kyle Rudolph or wide receiver Michael Floyd.  So, as is often the case in football, the game comes down to the trenches, and there, Michigan clearly has the edge.  Michigan brings back an experienced group featuring senior guard Stephen Schilling and junior center David Molk, while only 3 of Notre Dame’s 10 offensive linemen have actually started a game.  While I doubt Robinson will equal his performance from last week, the offense will prove too much for the Irish D.  Michigan 31 Notre Dame 24

Tales from the Deuce

Its the Shoes

In one of the most electrifying and improbable debuts in the storied history of the University of Michigan football program, Denard “Shoelace” Robinson finally gave some legitimacy to a coaching staff under siege.  For two years many Wolverines fans wondered when they would see signs of what they thought they were getting when head coach Rich Rodriguez came to Ann Arbor from West Virginia.  With a much improved offensive line and some solid play on defense, the Wolverines outplayed a UConn football team coming off of a successful season and bowl win.  Here are my takeaways from my Saturday in Ann Arbor.

What I liked:

1.  Robinson:  My sense has always been that Tate Forcier would be the better choice as the starter at quarterback, primarily because of his experience from last year.  However, I felt comfortable with the idea of Robinson as the starter.  Considering how high the stakes are for Rich Rod this season, the starter he chose would clearly be the person he felt best gave the team the chance to win.  Thankfully Robinson did not disapprove.   His 383 yards of total offense and 197 yards rushing were single-game records.

2.  The offensive line:  Rodriguez finally has some experience upfront and it showed.  As a team, Michigan averaged 4.7 yards per carry and protected Robinson quite well in the passing game.

3.  Key plays on defense: J.T. Floyd’s forced fumble on the goal line was the play of the game.  With Michigan driving the ball 95 yards down the field on the ensuing drive, the fumble created a 13 point (missed the extra point) swing.

What I didn’t like:

1.  Devin Gardner as the backup.  To me this makes little sense.  There are only two plausible explanations for Forcier being relegated to the #3 spot.

a.  Gardner is better
b.  Forcier done screwed up again

To me neither explanation is grounds for burning a redshirt.  Even a basic understanding of football would tell you that freshmen quarterbacks rarely play well.  We would be lucky to get a performance out of Gardner this season, that would be as good, if not better than Forcier’s last year.  Indeed, Forcier’s performance last year as a starter was strong for a freshman (see Brian Cook of Mgoblog’s graph on this very subject).  Since quarterbacks generally get better with their second year, AND he was considered to be neck and neck with Robinson for the starting job, it just doesn’t add up that he’s the third best qb on the roster.  If Gardner isn’t the second best quarterback on the roster, why play him?  Thus, reason (a) doesn’t make any sense.  As far as reason (b), disciplinary action hardly seems like a good reason to play with redshirts.  Look, I get it; Forcier has some serious maturity issues (tweeting, emailing the media, skipping class and workouts).  But we were all led to believe that he had cleaned up the act, so what happened to warrant Forcier playing second fiddle to Gardner?  Of course we’ll never know, since Rich Rod’s been pretty mum about this.  Regardless, I just can’t see how this move makes sense.

2.  Defensive pressure.  In order to win going forward, the defense is going to have to put some pressure on opposing offenses.  Last Saturday the Wolverines failed to sack Huskie qb Zach Fraser even once.  Considering the Huskies brought back 4 offensive lineman from last year, we should fare a little better with future opponents.  Still, our glaring weaknesses in the secondary will require that we put at least some heat on opposing offenses up front in order to compensate.

3.  The running backs.  While Robinson was amazing on his feet, the guys that actually earn their keep running the ball were less impressive.  In fact, Robinson was the only guy that averaged over 4 yards a carry.  I had hoped that someone would emerge as the leader among the group but that simply did not happen.  Perhaps when redshirt freshman Fitzgerald Toussaint comes back from injury he can fill that void as “the guy” in the backfield.

Iowa 30 – Michigan 28

Michigan Iowa Football

Michigan’s loss on Saturday to the Iowa Hawkeyes was no doubt frustrating.  Despite strong performances by several players, the Wolverines played clumsily, surrendering the ball 5 times to their opponent.  Despite numerous turnovers, the Wolverines still had an opportunity to win the game late.  Here’s a few takeaways:

The Good: Michigan’s physical play on both sides of the football. Offensively, the Wolverines established the line of scrimmage early by engineering a 72-yard drive, led by Brandon Minor.  Overall, the Wolverines averaged nearly 4.5 yards per carry.   Defensively, the Hawkeyes were limited to 2.4 yards rushing.  Along the defensive line, the Wolverines got strong play, most notably defensive end Brandon Graham who registered 2 sacks, 9 tackles, with 3.5 for a loss.

Along the same lines, I loved the aggressive game plan defensively.  Often times, there were 8-9 men in the box and they brought constant pressure from all over the field.

Donovan Warren got off to a great start with an interception for a touchdown.  Despite Iowa bizarrely targeting him throughout the game, he had a strong game.

The Bad: Michigan’s continued an awful trend of playing poor defense on third down. The most glaring example came on a 47 yard completion on 3rd and 24 .  In another situation, Hawkeyes tight end Tony Moeaki broke open in a 3rd and 12 situation for a 35 yard touchdown.

The Ugly: Perhaps the most obvious would be the turnovers. It would be easy to say that these mistakes were a result of youth.  Yet two fumbles came at the hands of two of Michigan’s senior players: receiver Greg Matthews and tailback Brandon Minor.  The latter could not have come at a worse time, as the Wolverines were in the midst of a 51 yard drive.  Had they scored, they would have likely gone into the half with a one point lead.

Rodriguez’ decision to keep Tate Forcier out of the game on the last possession. Although many have argued that Rodriguez’ decision to remain with the hot hand was sensible, it was clearly misguided.

On the previous drive I commended Rodriguez for mixing things up by bringing in freshman quarterback Denard Robinson.  Rodriguez obviously felt that the offense needed a jolt and the freshman quarterback provided that.  Robinson showed great poise in making critical throws and he further demonstrated why its so difficult to keep him on the bench.   Nevertheless, bringing him back out there on the subsequent drive was a poor decision by Rodriguez and the facts bear that out.

First, the previous drive led by Robinson took 4.5 minutes.  The Wolverines would not have that luxury on the subsequent drive.  The reason why the drive took so long is because Robinson utilized both running and passing to make his way downfield.  In fact, 42 of the 60 yards gained on that drive came from Robinson scrambling.  Secondly, a significant factor in Robinson’s effectiveness on the previous drive was the very fact that he may run.  In the final drive, it was clear that he would not have that luxury.  The Wolverine got the ball back on their own 17 yard line with 1:21 left in the game and no timeouts.  All the Hawkeyes would have to do is drop back in a zone with no fear of the run, in hopes that Robinson would make a mistake with his arm.  Sadly, that is precisely what Robinson proceeded to do.  It would have been more sensible to bring Forcier back in to the game for obvious reasons.  For starters he’s already demonstrated an ability to engineer game winning drives.  Further and most obvious, he is a better decision maker and thrower of the football.  Despite these obvious facts, Rodriguez chose to use his gut and not his head when he sent Robinson back out.

Ultimately, this has no bearing on what I think of Rodriguez.  Simply put, I think he’s one of the best coaches in college football.  I am also not suggesting that the decision to sit Forcier on the last drive cost the Wolverines a victory.  Rather, I’m simply trying to illustrate how in this particular situation, a different decision may have lead to different results.